Umbraco vs Sitecore and Optimizely

An in-depth comparison of Content Management Systems

Selecting the ideal Content Management System (CMS) for your organisation can often feel like navigating a labyrinth, with so many options vying for attention. In this article, we delve into a comprehensive comparison of three prominent CMS platforms: Umbraco, Sitecore, and Optimizely (formerly Episerver). Each of these platforms offers unique features and capabilities designed to meet different business needs and technical requirements.

We will explore how these systems stack up against each other in terms of usability, customisation, scalability, and overall performance. By understanding their strengths and limitations, you will be better equipped to make an informed decision on which CMS best suits your organisation’s digital strategy.

Basic Information

To start, let’s look into a bit of basic information on our three companies and their products.

Umbraco

Founded: 2005
Location: Denmark
umbraco.com
Open-source
Free version available

Sitecore

Founded: 2001
Location: United States
sitecore.com
Advanced functionalities
Caters to large businesses

Optimizely

Founded: 2010
Location: United States
optimizely.com
AI driven insights
Visual builder

Umbraco vs Sitecore

Whilst Umbraco and Sitecore share similarities, both being written in C# and deployed on Microsoft’s .NET framework, offering third party community-built features and plugins, and of course facilitating content management, they actually differ dramatically in several important ways that potential customers should consider before deciding on a weapon of choice.

First of all, cost. Umbraco offers a free version, which is great news for small businesses who don’t have the budget for expensive options but still want a user-friendly, highly customisable CMS. Another plus for Umbraco is that customers can upgrade to the paid version at any time for additional features, accessible 24/7 support, and much more.

Sitecore does not offer a free version, operating on a licensing model that will cost north of $80,000 p/a. This is one reason Sitecore is often recommended for enterprises with large, diverse customer bases. Now, for the money, customer will have access to advanced marketing tools, comprehensive support, integrated e-commerce functionality, robust analytics, and cloud support.

Secondly, lets dive further into the differences in complexity.

Umbraco is known for its gentle learning curve, boasting an intuitive and user-friendly interface that is both simple and flexible. Sitecore is known for its advanced functionalities, offering a more comprehensive array of marketing tools for personalisation, testing, and automation. Whilst this additional functionality can provide digital marketing teams with more options to achieve their goals, it also requires a team with advanced technical knowledge to implement. Adversely, Umbraco’s WYSIWYG editor provides a more than suitable option for businesses who need a straightforward CMS.

Finally, let’s look into some statistics.

Below, we compare the average go-live and average return on investment times between Umbraco and Sitecore.

Average go-live time

Average ROI time

As the above graphs show, Umbraco’s ease of use and aforementioned gentle learning curve help to vastly reduce both go-live and ROI times whilst Sitecore’s advanced functionality and complex implementation mean that customers will be waiting considerably longer for to see results.

Umbraco vs Optimizely

Once again, we’ll start with cost.

Optimizely, formerly Episerver, is one of Sitecore’s closest competitors, and the two share similarities. Both operate on a licensing basis, and both are designed for a wider array of digital professionals as opposed to Umbraco’s content-editor driven focus. Thus, Optimizely is not cheap, licensing starts at around £30k and may require up to another £30k for implementation. Whilst this is significantly cheaper than Sitecore, customers will need to decide whether these prices are justifiable based on the size of their business, customer-base, budget, and business needs.

Shall we look at functionality?

Optimizely isn’t just expensive for the sake of it. It comes with a more than comprehensive catalogue of features and functionality, including:

AB Testing
App Design
B2B eCommerce
Content Experience
Content Management
Content Marketing
Content Optimisation
Customer Data Platforms (CDP)
Digital Asset Management
Digital Experience Platforms (DXP)
eCommerce
eCommerce Merchandising
eCommerce Personalisation
eCommerce Search Feature Management
Headless CMS
Landing Page
Marketing Calendar
Mobile App Optimisation
Performance Testing
Personalisation
PIM
Product Recommendation Engines
Usability Testing

Much like Sitecore, Optimizely is a powerful Digital Experience Platform (DXP) that enables businesses to manage and optimise their digital presence across various touchpoints. It offers features that allow companies to create tailored user experiences and make data-driven decisions. Optimizely's Content Cloud and Commerce Cloud provide robust tools for content management and e-commerce, respectively, while its Customer Data Platform helps in understanding and anticipating customer behaviour.

Umbraco, as mentioned previously, is an open-source CMS known for its flexibility and ease of use. It allows for extensive customisation and is highly adaptable to specific project requirements. Umbraco is favoured by developers for its intuitive interface and strong community support.

Finally, let’s dive into another statistical comparison.

Average go-live time

Average ROI time

Similarly to our previous comparison, Umbraco comes out on top for both go-live and ROI times. However, Optimizely’s average go-live times are much closer to Umbraco’s than Sitecore.

So where does this leave us?

When selecting a CMS, it’s important to not only consider upfront costs but also long-term flexibility, usability, and scalability. That’s where Umbraco shines - offering an open-source platform that empowers businesses with ease of use, customisation, and community-driven innovation.

Unlike Sitecore and Optimizely, which come with steep licensing fees, Umbraco allows organisations to start without financial barriers, making it accessible to businesses of all sizes. And while Sitecore and Optimizely may tout advanced features like personalisation and eCommerce, these functionalities are not exclusive to them. With official paid-for packages and bespoke development tailored to your unique use case, Umbraco competes at a feature level while maintaining its signature flexibility and ease of use.

Through Northern Wolf's expert guidance, businesses can unlock Umbraco’s full potential - whether through additional custom functionality, personalised digital experiences, or a fully integrated eCommerce solution. Instead of being locked into an expensive, rigid platform, Umbraco gives you the freedom to shape your digital presence exactly the way you need it.

So, should you make the switch? The answer lies in how much control and scalability you want for your business. With Umbraco’s developer-friendly ecosystem, cost-effective model, and the backing of Northern Wolf’s expertise, your digital strategy is future-proof, robust, and adaptable - without the limitations of a high-cost CMS.

Umbraco isn’t just another CMS - it’s the smart choice. Contact Northern Wolf today to discuss anything Umbraco.

Umbraco vs Sitecore and Optimizely

See what else we've been talking about

A Beginner’s Guide to the Umbraco Backoffice

Umbraco 14 – What’s the difference?

Think we can work together?

Let's get started…